<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Concrete Is the Opposite of Abstract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scottvandam.com/blog/2010/03/concrete-is-the-opposite-of-abstract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scottvandam.com/blog/2010/03/concrete-is-the-opposite-of-abstract/</link>
	<description>My Personal Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 02:59:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://scottvandam.com/blog/2010/03/concrete-is-the-opposite-of-abstract/comment-page-1/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 17:32:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scottvandam.com/blog/?p=241#comment-299</guid>
		<description>I fancy calling Abstractos = Innovators, and Concreters = Implementers.
I have often worked with effective/fast implementers, but not always good innovators.  The shortest path between two points looks different from the ground, than from the hill-top. 
The implementer looks to his tools to get to the goal asap.  
The innovator looks for a hill. There is inherent tension between the two.
When we run into impasses, we look ahead, whether we blame the tools or ourselves. Innovators re-calibrate the tools and endeavor to bypass the barrier, sometimes to find themselves at the same or a new impasse once more.  Eventually, someone cries, “Stop! Find a hill, and report back.” And the innovator smiles.
&quot;Little pain&quot; points to tools.  &quot;Big pain&quot; points to hills. &quot;Before pain&quot; points to nothing new. 
I like hills, and get jazzed by the view as well as sharing them with skilled implementers.
Today, I’m in the hills. A quote  seems apropos:
“It is wonderful what you can do when you have to.”   
~C.S. Lewis (1898-1963)
And which way is more wonderful: concrete or abstract? 
The answer is &quot;Yes&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fancy calling Abstractos = Innovators, and Concreters = Implementers.<br />
I have often worked with effective/fast implementers, but not always good innovators.  The shortest path between two points looks different from the ground, than from the hill-top.<br />
The implementer looks to his tools to get to the goal asap.<br />
The innovator looks for a hill. There is inherent tension between the two.<br />
When we run into impasses, we look ahead, whether we blame the tools or ourselves. Innovators re-calibrate the tools and endeavor to bypass the barrier, sometimes to find themselves at the same or a new impasse once more.  Eventually, someone cries, “Stop! Find a hill, and report back.” And the innovator smiles.<br />
&#8220;Little pain&#8221; points to tools.  &#8220;Big pain&#8221; points to hills. &#8220;Before pain&#8221; points to nothing new.<br />
I like hills, and get jazzed by the view as well as sharing them with skilled implementers.<br />
Today, I’m in the hills. A quote  seems apropos:<br />
“It is wonderful what you can do when you have to.”<br />
~C.S. Lewis (1898-1963)<br />
And which way is more wonderful: concrete or abstract?<br />
The answer is &#8220;Yes&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

